this is what i am being told, page-9

On a positive note.

Very happy that the Europeans got the EPC.

If China "didn't" ive a rats-ass about this, they never deserved to get the tender in any event - but still wondering why they would have tendered.

I don't think China is having shampers right now!!
Them being left on the outer might just make things interesting.

Donedeal, no not fuming - peeved off somewhat because I expected a bit more on the EP and because a CR seems an inevitability. You happy?? You've never been happy with anything about SDL for all these years - So how do you feel?? (in honesty?)

Also just wondering why Jill would have stated (or something to that effect to Dugsab as recently as 4 June???):

Dugsab posted:

"Jill referred me to slide (or page) 11 of the recent presentation, and explained that we can expect news regarding the top three items of stage one, that is:

1. Mining, Processing and Infrastructure
2. Rail
3. Port"

And this

"Jill also stated these three items are "mutually inclusive""

The first quote,I think the statement was pretty unequivocal - "the top three items in the slide" - so where is the news- or was it alays only intended to mean that news re item one will be to he effect that it will be finalised later down the track? Not sure.

But what does "mutually inclusive" really supposed to means?