Still getting creative with the truth I see. I'm sure that impresses the poor ignorant nannas that watch SKY after dark.
Why don't you mention that SA ( or any other state ) simply doesn't have enough renewable infrastructure in place at this time to be completely zero carbon anyway ? That the renewable system isn't fully developed in order to provide 100% of the power supply .
Therefore, any argument that renewables can't do the job is actually false.
Why don't you mention that SA achieved over 50% of it's power from renewables last year with a relatively new, undeveloped renewable energy system ? A system without any significant grid storage in place .
Seems you like to leave a lot of the relevant information out of your posts. Now, why would that be ?
Still waiting for the answer on who should be the first mover btw . Gone all shy on that one as well, have we ?
