Fair enough - but if you want to use the line of being so clever by shifting your money from QBL to TON and your post implies that - then what I would like to know is what is the difference between the phrases in the TON announcement and the QBL announcement of last week?
To demonstrate my point, I have cut and pasted the relevant section of the TON announcement below. I have underlined the phrasing that I think is the same as the exuberant phrasing in the QBL statement of last week. Oh ... and there's no mention of JORC. And I am not saying that QBL dd the right thing last week - they could have been much better.
My point is that this stuff is the language of the junior miners. Why QBL got whacked and criticised so harshly is beyond me.
Anyway, make up you own mind.
"Triton Minerals Managing Director Brad Boyle said “To intercept a further 313m cumulative width of graphite mineralisation in a single hole and still open at depth, some 500m south east from the last major interception is an astounding result.
Further, the latest assay results are demonstrating that the Nicanda Hill prospect mineralisation contains multiple high grade graphite zones averaging 11% graphite carbon. These are very exciting results for Triton and continues to show the world class potential of the Balama North project.”
QBL Price at posting:
2.2¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held