I think you could argue it is a management issue by them stating a pretty tight date expectation to the market. They shouldn't give such a firm timeline, knowing that Oceania-wide, labs are under very heavy workloads. Maybe "by years end" would have been better than giving 4-6 weeks or what ever it was as an example to give some time-flexibility. It just leads to changing goalposts, which they definitely don't need more of. It isn't as if they are oblivious to the lab delay issues experience by most mines over the last few years.
