thor worth investment even without uranium, page-7

Well YOU guys can back the bread and butter and an entree ten-bagger will be OK on that (my free-carried oppies from 10c) ...... but personally I dont give a craap about anything bar the CAKE. We are in a ripsnorting (great name rips) Uranium boom in its INFANCY and will soon enough be talking quarter lb/t as being do-able, so more inclined to think along Conix's line, tho methinks even he may prove to be a tad conservative looking out over next coupla years. Any believers in URANIUM would be scanning the candidates on whats available atm and not too many come up in PROVEN OLD U GROUND with NO SOVEREIGN RISK, not even LOCAL BEING IN THE NT. As I said, they should shelve the Moly project and let the buyers come running in due course (steel bridges dont last long without Moly so thats OK, so long as its done this decade before the BIG projects starts showing up) ....... and INSTEAD GUNGHO ON THE U which is heading for MULTIPLES of its present price over next 5 years. I want to see an initial JORC resource in the NT within 12 months coincident with a 200 buck cake price and NO DILUTION for existing shareholders save an SPP and minimal strategic top-up to the U-boys ..... and then you will see what I'm salivating about. Sorry about the nil paragraphs but its all one single thought praise Zeus haha. And for the downrampers, no probs, provides cheap accumulation opportunities at the RIGHT TIME. Technos looking better by the minute. But thats my personal opinion bros.