"You know a lot for someone who doesn't hold."
Since when did the criterion for knowledge become that one needs to first hold a stock before being able to comment?
"If you are short, you are a holder. It's deceptive to say non holder as a shorter."
I agree.
And that's exactly why I said "non holder".
Because that's what I am.
On what basis do you automatically assume otherwise?
"You know a lot for someone who doesn't hold." Since when did...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 47 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)