THR versus WLF, page-3

Good comparison Snowkat, if you look at the wolf website and the wolf presentations they certainly look more professional and believable than Thor...

Thor and Wolf are not too far apart...Thor's annual target production is low compared to peers but otherwise there is no obvious reason as to why Wolf is in production and Molyhil is not in production already.

However we cannot dismiss the MB effect...MB has repeatedly messed up and has zero trust or belief by the market....there has been mention of contamination of product putting at least one potential purchaser off...and the constant almost predictable news feed promising 'near term' production and 'enhanced' DFS's not to mention the 3b and 5b'conveyor and the 4 billion shares...MB's focus appears somewhat self centered...


Thor doc with peer comparison chart...
http://www.thormining.com/research_may2014.pdf

Wolf doc with peer comparison chart...
http://www.wolfminerals.com.au/IRM/...1066-97584397/BrisbanePresentationOctober2009

Bear in mind...any production at Molyhil is 2 years (min) away...any other suggestion is deceitful and probably the reason MB continually uses the financially vague and meaningless 'near term' phrase so often...

With the gold price firming i have more hope for springhill or dare i mention dundas (my secret fantasy)...;-)

heres hoping...
MT