"now, I actually like the work you do - but, we really need...

First 196 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
madamswer

16,402 Posts.

7957

02/08/20

17:03

Post #: 46248317
Share

Originally posted by pintohoo ↑

that's your answer???

that's it???

I have posted several posts on the 'current' damage showing to survivors

I have also posted many posts on the fact that this virus is novel and we will be finding more and more damage most likely from it for years - I have referenced other virus (of which there are many) - that cause massive ongoing problems and cause lots of different diseases later in life AND in the next offspring generation

my posts all have references

you have posted merely counting the dead as if that's the only health cost

it's BS -----------

now, I actually like the work you do - but, we really need people like you to look further than the immediate death count - because the greatest risks lie there - and, almost for sure - the greatest health costs ------- of which, we are just beginning to see the scale of what that might be like - and, it's staggering

Expand

"now, I actually like the work you do - but, we really need people like you to look further than the immediate death count - because the greatest risks lie there - and, almost for sure - the greatest health costs ------- of which, we are just beginning to see the scale of what that might be like - and, it's staggering"

Hyperbolic, but unsubstantiated, adjectives such as "lots of different diseases", "staggering scale" and "massive problems" don't past muster, I'm afraid.

Because if they did, we would be forced to believe everything we encounter in the media.

I am, however, very ready to have my opinions swayed by rigorous clinical evidence, with statistical relevance, published in independent scientific papers and having been reviewed appropriately by appropriately qualified experts.

I'm afraid I saw no case of that in any of your contributions.

.
3 Upvote

Reply