oneclip,There is a very big assumption in that post. "I believe...

oneclip,

There is a very big assumption in that post. "I believe there is a reason why BAE, Colt, and the like have not bought a share in MST".

How do you know none of them have brought a share in MST? Do you know who the majority owner of MST current is?

Do you know who Springtree was acting on behalf of when it suddenly created the ASOF which acquired the majority of the notes?

Don't you think MST is a very odd thing to invest in as your first investment as a new fund in a market like AU.

Odd also that somebody would negotiate to buy the notes privately then request consessions from the company whose notes you are buying (changed notes conversion price and expiry extension) in exchange for a loan then turn around a sue that company and demand your loan money back. Wouldn't that very act seem to put at risk all the cash you just paid to privately buy the notes in the first place?

And more importantly who the hell is Luxivest? MST continue to refer to ASOF as being owned by Lind Partners despite the fact that we have already proved that The Lind Partners is actually Springtree. Despite this I have seen no discussion about who this latest dodgy mob is. Do a quick good Google search on "Luxinvest Capital Advisors S.A". Do you think its odd that 90% of returned search results point back to the MST announcement. Surely a international investment firm has it finger into everything, yet just like ASOF, other than MST they don't rate a mention other than in their own website and the usualy businss listing web trawler websites.

Still think you know who doesn't own MST ? I sure as hell don't know who does so no way I could be sure who doesn't.

Sorry, not being critical. Just thought it was a pretty big assumption given the open questions about who the hell is actually behind these failed transactions.