It seems some are not aware of the reasoning I proposed the above. It was out of the concern that the current board lack the acumen (imo) to transition this company.
Hence no mention of names, and purely the question to see if we actually have the capacity to do so.
I agree the current board have been successful in initiating relationships, and tech development but we are transitioning.
Be nice to hear the new directors involvement, and in actual fact what involvement each of the board actually have not within the day to day but the overall growth strategy of the company.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- Time for change.
Time for change., page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 54 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable