I see posts getting through with 'profanity', so long as it is in context. Mentioning the futures are turning to shit is one thing, and rarely gets pulled - calling someone a shitty little fuck is another, and usually doesn't last long.
From what I've seen, there is no tolerance for racism, sexism, etc. once a TOU is submitted. Some racist weasles like pongosniffavitch manage to slip through, but the more open system of naming and shaming should help to keep more of them in line.
But each to their own, I'm perfectly happy to accept that some see the moderation as heavy handed, I'm just saying I don't see it that way.
Back to L.C, and your last comment, I couldn't agree more, it is the most thoroughly low-risk project in Australia, and the commercialisation process will be the product of a very conventional development operation that has been completed thousands of times in other countries. Combined with the excellent temperatures and permeability (for high flow rates), L.C would be one of the most attractive projects to funds who are looking for low risk yet high return exposure to the sector.
PAX Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
