previous board were buying with ears pinned back at double this price. quite a few million shares. maybe that's because they knew what they were experienced US executives who knew what they were doing , and not so clearly out of their depth. on similar note, can we assume a 50% reduction in director fees as first cost saving? the fees were supposedly previously higher than typical due to need to have experienced US executives on the Board. now high fees are inexperienced aussie rabbits in headlights just simply filing their own boots?
previous board were buying with ears pinned back at double this...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
