yes I am.
1.0 Land for agriculture.
2.0 Land for exploding population.
3.0 Resources to control and exploit such as rare earth, gold, uranium, iron ore.
4.0 Small existing population with no poverty like in third world countries to provide cheap efficient workforce.
You use the same old argument as was the case in WW2 before the Japanese invasion south. Rely on our allies ?
The subs will give us access to new technology in the 2040s.
The AUKUS unites our bonds to our allies for the next generation of Australians.
$400 billion is not a large sum compared to other socialist agendas considering the long life of the subs.
Your sentiment is understood but is not at all pragmatic in the unstable world in which we live.
We should be spending more on defence even if it means higher taxes for all. Your argument about paying zero taxes is totally outside this and a diversion to what is a failure by our governments over many decades and needs to be addressed as a separate issue.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- TIME TO CANCELL $400 BILLION AUKUS SUBS !!!
TIME TO CANCELL $400 BILLION AUKUS SUBS !!!, page-17
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 113 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online