I wonder about three percentages1. The % of time that the proposals are actually being processed i.e. reading, cross checking references/data etc. Basically stuff that can't and shouldn't be rushed.
2. The % of time that a proposal is waiting on someones desk simply because that person has the luxury 3 Months before it needs a stamp from them3. To be a fly on the wall of the EPA and see the % of time they are actually working...
Perhaps they are actively maintaining the illusion that the longer they take, the more thorough their process is.
I think based on simple logic, it shouldn't take longer to review a study than it took to produce it, so they're not fooling anyone.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TMT
- Time to have a say
Time to have a say, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add TMT (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online