Timelines to development

This post is more negative than the usually positive posts I publish about TNG, and I realise that I run the risk of coming across more hot and cold than @Tigers1980 reading the latest EIS update while taking an ice bath in a volcano.  

I am positive for TNG and am a long time holder, but I think we all recognise that a carrot has been dangled in front of mum & dad investors for a very long time.  The reason for this is so CR's which need to be conducted during the journey can be done at a healthy level, but the side effect of this is that people will eventually lose faith, which from a majority of holders posts is what we are now witnessing.  I want to post this so holders are not under the illusion of fluffy news, and want a real company update.

Paul B needs to become honest and transparent moving forward before we lose investors.  Paul, an update is needed, and it needs to be honest.  Where is the company at with securing a titanium off-take partner, as the story about an MOU with Wogen is a little old, will this be tied up as titanium is where 75%+ of TNG's profit is.  We have engaged TiPMC Solutions LLC as a highly paid consultant to do this in July of last year, and they have still not been able to find a buyer who will sign a binding agreement with TNG....in almost a year.  Why is this?

Shareholders need an honest update, not like the ones below:

2012 news release: (production in 2014)


2013 news release: (construction in 2014)

2014 news release: (Construction in 2015)

2015 news release: (construction in 2017)

2016 news release: (construction in 2017)


News update please Paul, I am flying blind at the moment and usually maintain investments in companies which are transparent so that an informed investment decision can be made, not guesswork or dot-joining.

Wanderdog