tincom says yes, page-43

Macro20

That is a good link.

When you read and digest all the comparison stats provided in that link, there are 2 techs that claim to reduce CO2 emissions by up to 40%,,, That 40% emmission reduction is the important ( enviro) statistic

But,,,, when you go to the 6th side heading, you will note that only one tech has a net beneficial CO2 position attached to that 40% ( commercial ) statistic

There's your polly, enviro, commercial buck stopping competitive edge right there.

The difference between low heat and medium heat requirements for the densification processes is where the value for all stake holders lay.

There are 2 ABSOLUTE competitive advantages to Coldry.

1 cheaper to produce

2 more carbon credits

Both are due to the nature of the IP

There is a big dollar and black balloon difference between low and medium heat costs to the refiner and the environment,,, hence, the per tonne price the end user.

The medium heat cost also means that the overall process diminishes carbon credits, therefore all users pay more,,, twice.

( Front end loading and back end loading )

Of the 7 techs listed, the majority read like train wrecks or potential train wrecks from a viability perspective.

It's a big industry. There will no doubt be marginal techs continuing to test the waters.

There is after all,,, more than one brand attached to any product that has the potential to make money in one or more specific application.... that's the business of business.