tindalo, page-9

Sandy i totally agree, all this potential and a bunch of clowns running a circus.


P1000 and 62strat,

maybe either can answer.

Tindalo -1 dry oil for 5 days then water.

confirmed oil col 130m plus. Traget confirmed and dry.

ST-1 pump dry oil until they acidised it and had packer failure.

ST-1 workover, currently being evaluated. awaiting.

Six months of time wasting.

What i would like to know is:

would it have been better to P&A the well, and re-positioned the AD if neccessary to drill a new well.

62strat has mentioned this is the most expensive option, but with oil col confirmed, extra data obtained,
would it have been better to plug and abandon T-1 and drilled a T-2 well in a better location.

Because, they did go back and they did re-drilled T-1 exploration well, They re-entered it. They re-entered the same problem with lost circulation issues they encountered b4.
I assume they did this to save money. am i correct. because while it may have seemed like a great spot, the aquifer, somewhat changed that.

Would it have been better to re-drill a well at TINDALO, and gotten it right a lot easier than messing around like they have done.???????