What context? Your opinion was that Talga should have preserved...

What context? Your opinion was that Talga should have preserved capital by not completing early works, given the uncertain timeline. I pointed out that Talga has always forged ahead, which is why they are front runners.

"How about the numerous comments I've made about how Talga should take a more pro-actice approach by exerting political pressure, or otherwise, to press the SC into deciding."

The Supreme Court is an independent judicial body, separate from the government, which cannot interfere. You were apparently "adding more" at $1.70 without knowing how the Swedish court system works; perhaps a sign that you should improve your research.

The court's projected time of 1 to 4 months covers 90% of cases, which is why we can still find many examples showing longer time frames.

The good news is that data from the last 3 years shows that we are at the tail end of this process. In previous years, pending cases that are older than 6 months make up 9 to 10%. There is a strong drop off for pending cases older than 12 months: 0.9%

Talga has just crossed 11 months (if going by the original date, and not considering the power of attorney delays).