Sometimes they share good well-read insight and facts, with good...

Sometimes they share good well-read insight and facts, with good conclusions.
Sometimes they lead with good-well read insight but then strategically or ignorantly leave things out and come to absurd conclusions.
Sometimes they simply make wild claims ($10 by Nov) then push goal posts ($10 by end of dec) and by that point I've worked out who they are and they go on the ignore list.

It's incredibly frustrating as a reader. Naturally we are inclined to believe things that make our investment seem better, but that's a slippery slope.

I have a handful of trusted posters and I try my best to take everything else with a graphite-orb sized chunk of salt.