I very much doubt that 'major project status" will have any effect on the timelines for the EPA process which is very strictly controlled and highly regulated. Perhaps you can enlightened holders as to why you think this would be the case ?
For those that are interested, the timeline flow diagram published by the EPA can be found at
https://www.epa.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Policies_and_Guidance/EIA%20Procedures%20Manual.pdf
(version 3.0, dated 30 March 2020) Figure 14 on Page 48
"Figure 14 provides an overall summary of the stages and steps of the EIA process and the EPA’s
minimum target timeframes."
As I understand it, the other relevant factor is that real timelines get extended if the applicant ends up taking longer to provide information sought by the EPA at each stage of the process.
All IMHO, DYOR
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TMT
- TMT & AVL comparison
TMT & AVL comparison, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 182 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add TMT (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online