Re that name change conversation of the other day I think I’d vote yes for something more specific and reflective of vanadium - not as an ill informed flip flopper, but to change the energy around here a bit.
….Maybe in conjunction with some kind of positive funding announcement?
As it is it seems to me that despite the expert team and the groundwork that’s been done and including diligent attendance at every two bit mining conference on the circuit and the RCF backing the company is still unknown.
The name ‘Technology Metals Australia’ sounds generic, and that is amplified by the description that comes up when one does a search for that name on google ;
View attachment 5038933
.. It is almost as if they are still keeping their options open!
..And as a subject change, I wonder how that agreement to investigate vanadium electrolyte production capacity in Australia with Japanese partner LE System is going?
Might we get an update on that soon?
(As of 21/01/22 a feasibility study was to be prepared jointly, with technical support provided by LE System
[ref].)
.. Relative to ‘liquid energy systems’ (after which LE Systems was named), here’s an excerpt from a story published last August on Vanadium Flow Batteries;
https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Te...n-duel-over-liquid-batteries-for-green-energy
…
“The global market for stationary battery storage units will reach 3.44 trillion yen by 2035, Tokyo-based research firm Fuji Keizai projects, or 140% the scale in 2021.
Yano Research Institute, also based in Tokyo, estimates that redox flow units will occupy 22% of the global next-generation battery market in 2030, trailing only solid-state lithium-ion batteries at 45% and organic rechargeable batteries at 24%, which do not use rare metals.”
cheers
