TMT - its a numbers game., page-10

sorry mate I can't see a problem, even if they are risk free due to there strategy I can't see how it's any different to any other stock you can hold, were management get payed regardless if the company goes out the back door or not and any Failure is on the shareholders , it does not take away from the quality of the asset or what they have achieved or the potential here

there end goal is to make money and that's why they are were they are, because they are successful and manage risk, yeah they might have some winners and losers everyone does..whether they are risk free doesn't seam to have any negative effect on how motivated they are to develop the asset... sorry mate I honeslty can't see the problem... they have a great business model and are risk free and us shareholders are taking the risk?...

basically every person playing the spec end is aware they are taking a risk... just look at TNG have gone nowhere in 7 years but the MD gets payed 700k a year...

also you hold BRK so you I'm a bit confused...