TNG BOD over the years, page-33

This is the response that the NT EPA response was for
https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02378875-6A1034615?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4

This was the initial response after the news article from TNG

https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02385363-6A1037111?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4

Followed by the following announcement on the 14 July, sounds a little like humble pie was on the menu.

https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02395134-6A1040779?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4

The brilliant idea to move the plant to the mine site seems to be the end result, once they realized a hissy fit was not the way to go.

https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02415131-6A1048026?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4

Makes me think more and more a new change of direction with a suitable BOD is required by this company. The proposed chairman is only to facilitate the change of board, not a permanent fixture.