Share
90 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 13
clock Created with Sketch.
24/07/18
10:55
Share
Originally posted by 4hrworkweek
↑
Maybe you should ask Neil that question about TA? He was the absolute master charter according to many in here well before he became a company rep. In fact so many people loved his posts and respected his charting that it’s probably a contributing factor as to why he was hired by the company. I personally don’t chart but I’m not about to challenge someone like Kate saying I clearly know better when I don’t.
Fundamental analysis is also something most holders don’t like either. Especially when it comes to government regulation and information coming directly from the TGA and ODC. If you do proper fundamental analysis then you can actually see that this might not be a great investment. Add to that the results from predicted harvest figures and the fact you are expected to pay more than double the sp for a cap raise of $5 million. Should a company prove their ability to manage a company’s finances before expecting shareholders to fork out more.. and yeah they have money in the bank.. isn’t that from previous cap raises?
So technically and fundamentally it probably isn’t the best investment. but yeah because it’s in the field of mm, hemp and mining and there’s so much potential it must be a good investment.. ignoring everything else..
And for the person who asked me about the seeds.. looks like the plants are growing maybe they got them from Elixinol? Haha! How the hell am I suppose to know the answer to that.. maybe it’s a seed from a crop that space people planted? Seriously that probably a question that Neil can answer? Throw it his way..
Expand
I asked you about where the seed came from because you quoted a figure of 16% of expected yeild based on planting the original 20T of seed. Now if the winter crop seeds came from the initial 20T then your equation and figure of 16% of expected yeild for 20T of seed is wrong. The question is: Do you know? I don't expect you to acknowledge this or admit that you may be wrong. What I totally expect is for you to divert attention and try and confuse the scenario with alternative arguments.
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.