Rhys I agree about privacy being important to some. it’s why I started this thread.
But the rest of your post seems to me to be a paranoid overreaction!
You say you don’t know if it’s a procedural necessity or not then start denigrating Ian and putting all sorts of unprofessional emotional agenda theories into what
IS most likely a simple business procedure relevant to this proposal, ie something with clear guidelines and plenty of precedents !
And calling him discourteous?
Would you prefer he never said anything in that update and just published the names?
I also note you are the only person who has called it a ‘
name and shame’ list!
Beyond that;
FAIR TREATMENT?
I have no idea of legalities but seeing as TMT has already named those who support the merger, why should opposers be treated any different ?
NO RUSH?
It’s not a Taylor Swift concert with punters shoving each other out of the way to get their orders in first!
I understand The SOA and expert opinion get released by ASIC on December 4 - Monday week.
- A - why on earth would anyone who values their privacy rush in with an opinion before then?
- B - as per my first post, I’m pretty sure anyone who already voted but didn’t realise names would be made public can simply make a strategic withdrawal by way of spending two minutes on a retraction that will last only until they vote again!