I don’t care how many are ‘probably in the top 20’
Rookie
That is not relevant to this thread.
Nor is any potential iceberg-sized contingent who have not yet sent opinion .
And I have no need to change its name!
Given the outrage posted by a few and - especially - the post by @Drum in sync (https://hotcopper.com.au/posts/70975767/single) on 18/11/23 where that poster wrote:
…I was very disappointed with the tone of that announcement and the threat of naming those who oppose the current deal...
I thought maybe there were others who signed who felt ‘threatened’ by the prospect of being named.
The reminder I posted that there is a ‘way out’ is for them - to act on or not .
Cheers
PS
if by writing I ‘might need to have another try’ you are wanting to infer I have some kind of sinister intent, I suggest you address what other erroneous convictions you are operating under .
The post is nothing more than what it is !
I don’t have any agenda beyond drawing attention to rationales that don’t hold water in the current situation such as
‘For years I hated AVL’
‘Sabine made me do it’
‘We are worth more because that’s what we always thought’
- the best ones?
‘RCF is a bogeyman trying to rip us off’
‘TMT board is a bunch of bogeymen trying to rip us off’.
‘Sabine is a bogeyman paid to disagree with our theories about how we are victims of bogeymen.’
‘External objective experts are bogeymen’
‘The merger proposal stinks because it was developed by company leaders who clearly don’t have the company’s best interests at heart even though we trusted them before .’
‘We want to get them over a numbers barrel as then they will be obliged to give us more’
