Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Wow , a 30 fold increase in allergic rhinitis and you reckon 'it...

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
ababab

1,210 Posts.

13/05/17

21:41

Post #: 24672879
Share

Originally posted by DamTriton ↑

One of the issues is that there were far too many unaccountable variables within the "study" to form ANY conclusion.

Peer review is not done by selecting/rejecting your reviewers (condition of one of the studies in OAT). That alone should ring alarm bells that all is not kosher with the article.

This "study" is so fatally flawed in its "due process" of research, that it really doesn't warrant any further research, time, or money.

I'm sure it will be dragged out again and again, this does not make it any "righter". It is still poor research methods, flawed design, and biased peer reviews (per statement by article linked by OAT).

Rise above that level of gullibility and do proper background searches of the linked articles and data source.

Expand

Wow , a 30 fold increase in allergic rhinitis and you reckon 'it really doesnt warrant further research' . And you think i am gullible?
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASX Market Close: BHP shares rise with iron ore – but so does CBA

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

Thursday's HotCopper trends: Mystery Trigg halt, Neurizon FDA feedback | July 10

TMG

Investors cautious as Trigg Minerals issues unusual trading halt

This thread is closed.

You may not reply to this discussion at this time.

There are more pages in this discussion • 499 more messages in this thread...

First 5 Last