tobacco donates $1.7m to coalition since 2004, page-12

  1. 20,020 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 870
    That is a pathetic flame benbradley. It seems when you are backed into a corner you start the abuse. Not very mature. You still did not answer the question about it being a "time-wasting diversion" - nothing could be further from the reality of the matter.

    The banning cigarettes idea was just a discussion point because it would be a potentially $31.5 billion per annum windfall for the economy. I know it is not going to happen. However, I do believe in 'user pays' so it is smokers who choose to smoke who need to pay for this impost on our economy. They need to stand up and admit it and cop the extra costs on the chin and not whinge about it. I am not prepared to subsidise their disgusting habit.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.