Instead of your 'sarcasm', a little reading might 'enlighten'...

Instead of your 'sarcasm', a little reading might 'enlighten' you.

From the Annual Report "No amounts have been approved or paid as at the date of this report in relation to 2010 or 2011 performance." (page 20)

Your 'simple' comment seems to have a degree of surreptitious nature further enhanced by your lack of disclosure as to any possible connection with MOD.

Being "aware of every single event in history of this company" should make you well aware that no pay rises or incentives have been paid in years.

Humpy, I am not sure what your agenda is, but you seem to have had every opportunity to be as aware as anyone, with your long-term holding and connections (met most of the executives), but you stick by this unsubstantiated and fallacious statement of "pay rises for everyone" and now say it is sacrasm?

I think you put up a very good, intellectual arguement. Now that is sarcasm. It reflects the irony of your statement in light of the facts and in context of everything else I have been saying about your comments. Everything you said around "pay rises for everyone" suggested there was no irony/sarcasm.

OK, here's a test of your motives. What do you think about the time where MOD was pulling the levers? If you don't reply, that will suggest that you do have some connection and don't want to 'dis' him. As an investor from the start and a Top 20 for 10+ years who is "well aware of every single event in history of this company", I would love to hear your informed opinion, supported by substantiation. The more detailed the better. PLEASE ENLIGHTEN US ALL. I'll be happy to hear some substantiation of your rationale for 'dising' the current guys while not hanging anything on MOD.