Oh indeed - they reduced their "projected nameplate production...

Oh indeed - they reduced their "projected nameplate production numbers" (as always stated to be 5,400 tpa NdPr since 2014) to 5,238 tpa at the AGM 2017 and used the (target missing) 5,238 tpa instead.

So would you rather tell me, if i should keep the 5,400 tpa nameplate production and then it´s still +33% to 7,200 tpa, or should i discount the 3% (the difference between targeted 5,400 tpa and 5,238 tpa they achieved in 2017) from the 7,200 tpa ... and calculate with 6,984 tpa, because Lynas estimations seem not to be so accurate?

Taking the lower number as reference to have a nice high percentage increase i a fine magic trick - but either Lynas missed it´s former goal of 5,400 tpa NdPr (in 2017 by 3%) and i need to calculate the increase also with a safety discount ... or i take "Lynas´s initial planned capacity of 5,400 tpa" and believe Lynas´s statement of 7,200 tpa - then it´s +33%.

Either way, i´ll end up at lower percentages than 50% (it was this number, i still don´t agree with) ... and also you (because even your "magically calculated data based to the latest numbers" 37,5% are below that).

What might this number be, if you count with the actual data of Q1-4 2018? Based on the 5,443 tpa - the inclrease will just be 32%. *shocked*

Keep your promotional numbers, i´ll keep mine - as long the difference of our calculations is not the minus of tomorrow

... but 50% remains nonsense.

PS: i looked up every comma and the usage of propper "tpa" ... just for you. If you still find a fault - keep it as a personal present