Honestly it is pertinent to note that investment perspective...

Honestly it is pertinent to note that investment perspective from retail investors is based on company announcements which usually entices investors to believe that delivery on outcomes without inordinate time lag is certain to happen. Fine print on performance issues will not be visible to investors unless company adopts transparent disclosure. Hope everyone agrees....

Retail investors are similar to parallel lines having short, medium and long term investment perspective. Each one needs to be respected - which companies also accept - often see becoming a substantial holder / ceasing a substantial holder announcements.

Each category investor has a view point and belief on announcement and their acceptable timelines on outcomes which they are entitled to having invested. If company lags behind in outcomes investor has a right to question and vent out disapproval of whats going on.

Diligent top management realize and quickly act redressing to gain back market interest.

The key point applicable to everyone (objective - SP rise) worth doing the research is to draw a fine line on what is announced and its outcomes - when and how timelines. This is the yardstick (overall fundamentals) which determines the SP valuation and it is the market dictum weather one likes it or not.

To repeat again, Volt needs to fast track initiatives to show market that past is behind and they can rely on trust again.

Time will only tell will TM looks into this and works aggressively to make this happen.

Our investment is not wrong looking into worth of Volt resources - but Volt performance is lagging way behind.