Tommy Robinson Appeal, page-3

I'm sure the Mirror is a delightful read but facts are not their strong point.

"The lord chief justice, Lord Burnett of Maldon, said he hoped the court would deliver judgment before the end of July."

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...l-to-remain-in-jail-as-judges-consider-appeal

To sum up the case:
1. No attempt by the court to identify the precise breach said to have been committed by Tommy.
2. Therefore, no submissions made by Tommy in reply.
3. No discussion advising Tommy about what breach he was on the brink of being imprisoned for
4. Upon sentenced, not being told what he did wrong.
5. Not admitting what he did wrong.
6. Failed out proper punishment. ...
7. Insufficient opportunity for Tommy to reflect and take advice, esp. to mitigation.
8. Summary proceedings should have happened.
9. Tommy deprived of chances to mitigate
1o. Bad sentencing, including that Tommy is held as a criminal, not a civil prisoner.

We should find out some time before the end of the month, or in August if you believe the Mirror.