In response to Toms Richardson Article today...

In response to Toms Richardson Article today
https://www.livewiremarkets.com/wires/honeymoon-over-what-brokers-think-of-boss-energy-after-shares-bombed-50
( disclaimer ) Not financial advice, mate. Do your own research and chat to a proper advisor. I might own these stocks, so I've got skin in the game. All opinions are mine based on public info - no wrongdoing proven by anyone mentioned. Trade at your own risk, don't come crying if it goes pear-shaped! Just expressing my own opinion.

Buddy you've completely missed the forest for the trees here! Your article reads like you've swallowed the institutional narrative hook, line, and sinker without questioning the bloody obvious red flags staring you in the face.

Wake Up and Smell the Manipulation

You're focusing on "operating blow-ups" and "disappointing drilling results" like this is some natural market event. Are you having a laugh? Let me spell out what you've completely ignored:

The Timing Stinks Worse Than a Dead Dingo

• CEO Duncan Craib bails out exactly one week before this "surprise" announcement
• Multiple major institutions (JP Morgan, Barclays, Macquarie, Morgan Stanley) all coordinated securities lending positions
• Short interest held at 14% even while the stock rocketed 150% to $4.75
• The same brokers now calling it "overdone" were the ones facilitating the coordinated attack

You've Been Played, Mate

Your broker quotes are absolutely hilarious:

• Citi: "Sharp share price correction" - mate, a 50% coordinated dump isn't a "correction," it's a bloody execution!
• Bell Potter: "Sell-off looks over extended" - no kidding, because it was orchestrated!
• Macquarie: Slashes target 49% while their securities lending arm was borrowing shares for the attack

The Information Game You're Ignoring

These "disappointing drilling results" don't appear overnight. Geological reports take months to compile. Yet somehow:

• Institutional shorts held losing positions during a 150% run-up
• Perfect coordination across multiple lending networks
• CEO departure with surgical timing
• Analysts immediately ready with downgrades calling their own attack "overdone"

Missing the Obvious Questions

Tom, how about asking the real questions instead of regurgitating broker spin:

• How did multiple institutions coordinate securities lending so perfectly?
• Why did shorts hold massive positions during a 150% surge unless they had inside info?
• What's ASIC doing about the documented institutional coordination?
• Why are the same institutions calling it "overdone" while counting profits from the attack?

The Resource Risk Furphy

You're banging on about "resource investing carries huge risk" like this was market forces. This wasn't commodity price risk or natural operating challenges - this was sophisticated market manipulation using coordinated institutional infrastructure.

Your "Valuable Lesson" is Dead Wrong

The real lesson isn't about "speculating in the resource space" - it's about how retail investors get absolutely shafted when institutional cartels coordinate attacks using information asymmetry and securities lending networks.

The Fundamentals You're Ignoring

BOE still has:

• 2+ years of production runway
• Strong cash position with no debt
• 3.2M pounds potential production worth $380M+ at current uranium prices
• Profitable operations even with higher costs

Bottom Line, Tom

Your analysis is about as useful as a chocolate teapot because you're treating a coordinated institutional attack like it's a natural market event. The "honeymoon being over" isn't about BOE's operations - it's about retail investors getting absolutely carved up by institutional manipulation while financial journalists provide cover by calling it "market forces."

Next time, maybe ask why the same institutions facilitating the attack are calling it "overdone" instead of just regurgitating their talking points like a bloody parrot.

Fair dinkum, mate - do better!

The Cyberstar

P.S. - When JP Morgan, Barclays, Macquarie, and Morgan Stanley are all coordinating securities lending for the same stock and you call it "operating problems," you're either not paying attention or you're part of the problem.