Benradi was a senator Abbott is lower house there is a...

  1. 17,261 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 196
    Benradi was a senator Abbott is lower house there is a definition of that that will drive each ones decision on how they sat and got in .

    You could say both sat in a safe seat i totally agree !

    Now one has the power of lower house one has the power of upper house .

    Why would you desert your lower house where it has the first power?

    Thats where the biggest support is in numbers of people in power .

    The percentages changes upside down in the senate and you well should get the balance to fight utopia?

    You dont need the second amendment if you cant get a tyrant in the first place !

    Britain has no guns !

    It has a westminster system .

    The tyrant has to change that system to create his own utopia and well that system fought the gun laws america fought for its independence from that system .

    The rest well two different systems they put guns in to control it and the right to say ffffff .

    And i dont disagree that politicians have not bastardised it for there own purposes the same as they would when they put it in place .

    History writes them up as being great im pretty sure they would be of the same mould we have now and be the scourge of everyones opinion .

    Bet there was a few speakers on speaker stones getting eggs tomatoes and every piece of shit they could get throw at them and rightly so .

    There would have been shooters hookers and whores and every piece of stuff we deal with we just never have had peace and even women dont bring that we know that !

    Comes a time someone wants their way and if they can garner the power they will do it even if they just want a legacy to be remembered by .

    They will use it .
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.