actually, to avoid any "loopholes" the question should be "how long ago, and by whom was the replacement of the extruder raised?" If you add "...for the purpose of sales collateral", this gives the company scope to deem that at the time it wouldnt add to sales collateral (which evidenced by their statements now, does.)
actually, to avoid any "loopholes" the question should be "how...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ECT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.68M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | $17 | 4.31K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 41 | 20133021 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4¢ | 13832711 | 24 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.45pm 19/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ECT (ASX) Chart |