As ashareholder I would prefer to see the asset remain in crb...

As ashareholder I would prefer to see the asset remain in crb and not taken awayfor $2

Therelinquished blocks are protected by the mining lease application which hasbeen recommended for grant. So once granted the company has lost nothing.

Whyare you batting for 2 individuals that now want to take the whole tenementaway?

Alegal dispute won’t help any of us and those that did their dd before goinginto this project knew there was a lengthy 2 year plus wait for permitting. Notmuch a company can do with that.

Speak to Peter Batten for the facts rather than relying on the rumors and innuendo on this chat room by 3 common posters all drinking the same coolaide