This is interesting Swingerz, and highlights the ridiculous...

This is interesting Swingerz, and highlights the ridiculous value that the CRB board thought appropriate to pay to a party they share an office with to reacquire a tenement that Ausco discarded for nothing. The noted references in this additional information post AGM , do acknowledge the Ausco decision to discard it was not an oversight it was in fact assessed and decisioned with appropriate due diligence, something which appears to be missing from the boards decision to repurchase this tenement.

One question on the top 20 list , there are shareholdings that do not appear in this list that should be noted in the top 20 why have they been omitted?