Toshiba device for cancer detection - threat?, page-5

Hey Tom, I spoke to MJ af the AGM about the change in the timeline and he pointed out that it would have been highly unlikely that BD1 would have met the previous target and that his preference is to be closer to the mark, if not earlier, rather than later all things considered, no doubt there is much to be considered. Navy touched on this in one of his post not long after the AGM. It was apparently on MJ's recommendation that the timeline be amended he had no hesitation in owning it.

Whilst I am a little disappointed that we may be waiting an extra 12 mths the upside for me from an operational perspective was the calibre of the people in this company, it is quite impressive. I think it was @WiseGuy who asked our CEO about other competitor technology's and the possibility of having the rug pulled from under our feet if someone got to market before BD1. The company is confident that they are ahead of the pack based on her response, surely TF would know the score and would not be partnered up with BD1 if there was a obvious threat. It seems as though we are in deep with Thermo Fisher deeper than I anticipated.