total revenue for rocklands $us17.8 billion, page-24

I don't see how the thread title is misleading? It's a simple statement on the expected revenues of the project. Even went into the details of the calculation, should've perhaps cited where the selling now at $230/t figure came from, and then why he reverted back to the current price of $160/t... but we're not exactly in an academic forum here are we?

Whether you accept his calculation is up to you, I certainly don't feel misled, I just read it and thought, 'that's a very... very dubious argument to put forward' and left it at that.

Then I read a post comparing the expected revenues of RXM with CDU, and then a bizarre line comparing the mc's of the two companies with the obvious insinuation that the two are linked. Which in fact is misleading.