I was the one that asked Paul Gavin that question. I was very...

I was the one that asked Paul Gavin that question. I was very relieved to hear that no papers had been rejected, because that is an essential test of our science.
However, I was surprised that consultants had to be employed to assemble these papers from the data bank. I would have thought that the scientists would have a first hand handle on the data and be the best people to decide on how it was to be published.
If they indeed have 10-12 more papers in the offing, they have not yet submitted any of them yet, they need to get a wriggle on.
One paper in a respected journal is a great start though and lets hope that as the papers are published they will communicate this information to shareholders.