Still positive about the review.
Naturally one assumes that because the present contract is regarded as unsatisfactory - unsatifactory for the people of the Congo - one anticipates some pain in the likelihood of increased taxes and/or royalty.
That is really fair enough.
The press delights in highlighting the leaked recommendation that Dikulushi be confiscated.
Not really conceivable.
Would be interesting to know the background and reason for the recommendation.
One wonders if RAID and Slater and Gordon actions are a factor.
A concern is that Anvil has requested a trading halt.
Does not seem to be a process requested by other companies in a similar position.
Hopefully Bill Turner is endeavouring to prevent insider/institutional buying or selling on "whispers" from insiders before the news is released.
He surely is anticipating some negatives - not positive review recommendations.
Therefor a trading halt suggests he is concerned that the review could have more serious implications than market anticipate.
He and I and other shareholders hope not.
Not long to wait now!
Tomorrow I believe?
Still positive about the review.Naturally one assumes that...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
