As i said HAS - if Ambro's are indicating that they don't have...

As i said HAS - if Ambro's are indicating that they don't have enough evidence to support what HLG has put forward the jury has to be out to some degree - they did use the term "going forward"

Guess it's all semantics - like Banks saying they have no exposure to the sub prime mess in US - becasue the question was asked about housing and not Bonds!

Got to love semantics it is indeed a deadly game - ihope for your sake and all HLG holders that the assurances were done as proper corporate governance should be!!