Fair comment SP3. However, I'm sure I'm not the only shareholder thinking it. It just highlights the poor communication of the company towards it's shareholders (of which I am still one).
Still, it was stated at the EGM earlier in the year that environmental concerns would be a major problem in URA securing something in the CR. So why wouldn't you send WM there in the first place? If the article is to believed then it sounds like that didn't occur.
translation, page-10
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)