i don’t believe it is that. I think it is about social...

  1. 17,558 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 325
    i don’t believe it is that. I think it is about social conditioning and individual rights gone nuts. Sure at one level it looks like immorality but for those indulging it seems more like a demand for decency and respect despite the lack of respect

    I don’t think it’s any different from those who support and promote promiscuity because they think it is somehow good, or narrowly defined roles for males and females because that is the right way. It’s only a different version of people reviling others because they disagree.

    i read this earlier today and it is worth reflect on

    The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him, and that the many were neither perverted nor sadistic, that they were, and still are, terribly and terrifyingly normal. From the viewpoint of our legal institutions and of our moral standards of judgment, this normality was much more terrifying than all the atrocities put together.”

    Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil

    intolerance may be a sin but unfettered tolerance also brings about disorder and abuse.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.