The proposed bill seems to legalize SSM whilst preventing people being forced to participate in SSM ceremonies directly (priest) or indirectly (florist , baker, etc).
LGB people should be free to marry whom they like.
Poeple should be free to with hold goods and services from events / activities / causes which they do not endorse. Note the discrimination is against the act / institution not the person.
If a Catholic / Islamic group went to a gay printer and said they wanted flyers to campaign for the repeal of SSM, should the gay printer be forced to provide them a service?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Treacherous Conservatives
Treacherous Conservatives, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 65 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SBW
SHEKEL BRAINWEIGH LTD
Dani Nadri, Country Manager Australia
Dani Nadri
Country Manager Australia
SPONSORED BY The Market Online