tree shaking, page-4

I'm thinking that S36_028-1 will have tongues wagging when released.

All conjecture of course and based upon the presumption that they'd only continue drilling whilst encountering mineralisation and cease drilling a little beyond.

Hole S36_026.

Hole S36_026 (Drilled vertically) struck 41m @ 2.1% copper, ending in mineralisation at 614.8m (Backtracking, mineralisation began at 573.8m). Hole S36_26-2 extends this hole to a depth of 707.2m. Assuming that mineralisation ended before they pulled the pin at 707.2m, perhaps around 20m prior, they could have encountered continuous mineralisation from 573.8m to around 687.2m (113.4m….. 2.1% or better would be handy)……..Eastern edge of high grade deposit no.2???????????

Now for S36_028-1

Drilled vertically, 102m due west of S36_026 and originally drilled to 524.5m. S36_028-1 extends this hole a further 461.8m, down to 986.3m. The obvious question is, why did they drill so deep?

The resource model shows hole 28 originally drilled vertically into the 0.35% shell but stopping short (524.5m) of where hole 26 hit the upper edge of what could be another high grade deposit at 573.8m.

The big question......Did they encounter mineralisation at around the same depth (Albeit 102m west) as hole 26 (Approx. 573m) and continue finding mineralisation all the way down to around 986m (462m)………It's difficult to see them throwing money away by drilling almost 500m further down for no gain. 50 or a 100m, maybe on a hunch but surely not 500m without good reason.

KITDD_034 cuts roughly through this area some 50m to the north and from the west so if a second deposit exists, the upcoming assays should lead the way.