1) That's right direct comparison on an oz for oz basis isn't reasonable. Why should it be?
2) I've given the three key reason why above why the deal should work for RRL rather than Anglo
3)I've given reason why it should work better for RRL as well. Which relates to point 1 ).
The key thing is RRL's directors have done the deal (tailored) to build their company.
Not Anglo and not IGO. They are also vastly more experience than you or I but at least I can recognise some of their logic.
Tropicana, page-141
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 177 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RRL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.56 |
Change
0.160(6.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.934B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.44 | $2.57 | $2.43 | $22.98M | 9.175M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3232 | $2.55 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.56 | 1444 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RRL (ASX) Chart |