1) That's right direct comparison on an oz for oz basis isn't reasonable. Why should it be? 2) I've given the three key reason why above why the deal should work for RRL rather than Anglo 3)I've given reason why it should work better for RRL as well. Which relates to point 1 ).
The key thing is RRL's directors have done the deal (tailored) to build their company. Not Anglo and not IGO. They are also vastly more experience than you or I but at least I can recognise some of their logic.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)