"NO bloody EVIDENCE HAS BEEN HEARD IN COURT THAT PROVES TRUMP'S GUILT."
Arh you where asking evidence of Trumps crime, I showed you a judge rules evidence committed Trumps crimes more likely than not.
Now you raise the bar, we have to wait for a guilty verdict. Yes a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty in court even if there is 100%. Stck with that
"It seems you believe Eastman to be innocent in spite of a court hearing but Trump guilty in spite of there being no court hearing."
Where did you get that? The evidence shows that both Eastman and Trump conspired to commit crimes
"Carter, who sits in federal court in California, said that the plan Eastman helped develop was obviously illegal and that Trump knew it at the time, but pushed forward with an effort he says would have effectively ended American democracy.
“If Dr. Eastman and President Trump’s plan had worked, it would have permanently ended the peaceful transition of power, undermining American democracy and the Constitution,” Carter wrote. “If the country does not commit to investigating and pursuing accountability for those responsible, the Court fears January 6 will repeat itself.”