Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

What are you mumbling about, the Constitution does not say...

First 153 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Glug

24,663 Posts.

1

05/03/24

22:45

Post #: 72761330
Share

Originally posted by Cowboyinvestor: ↑

go figure… someone should be convicted of the crime before the application of the constitution can be used…. And yet we were all be told until some of you were blue in the face that that’s not the case and the Colorado Supreme Court applied the constitution correctly….

Expand

What are you mumbling about, the Constitution does not say conviction of a crime is a prerequisite for being removed from the ballot.
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Making money: How many microcaps should be in an investor's portfolio?

Week 44 Wrap: Relatively boring week ahead of US election; HotCopper's most watched; Oz inflation at 3.5%

Aussie inflation seemingly hit a 3 year low. So why's the ASX200 red?

MIN

Movers and Shakers: Zip Co, MinRes, Kuniko, more – The week's top ASX gainers

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

'We're looking': Nickel-rich Indonesia sounds graphite warning to Aus producers

What each US election outcome would mean for Australian companies & investors

The Altcoin Landscape (Part 1): Key alternative cryptocurrencies to watch

There are more pages in this discussion • 130 more messages in this thread...

First 153 Last